Setting up an SMSF: how much is enough?

    A new report from the SMSF (Self-Managed Superannuation Fund) Centre of Excellence, a collaboration between SuperConcepts and The University of Adelaide, has highlighted how crucial the size of an SMSF is in relation to its overall performance.

    Entitled When size matters: a closer look at SMSF performance, the report analysed data from more than 20,000 SMSFs between 2008 and 2015[1]. The researchers discovered that the average balance across the funds was $845,000, with the average annual expenses coming to around $8919, or 2.8%. It is worth noting that all SMSFs in the data set have outsourced their administration to external providers.

    The report’s main finding was in relation to the recommended minimum size of a fund, and the benefits of economies of scale in this instance are as clear as ever. Despite a decline in operating costs in recent years, an SMSF’s expense ratio generally does not fall below 2% (approximate annual expense ratio of a retail superannuation fund) until funds reach $550,000[2]. This size is also generally the point where performance improves, and where the fund reaches a level that allows for diversification. SMSFs can be set up with balances of as little as $200,000, but these smaller funds are often insufficiently diversified which drives down returns. They become more viable if the trustee chooses to take on some of the administration themselves, however in many cases this is best left to professionals.

    That being said, an SMSF can have up to four members, so funds may be pooled with spouses and/or family members in order to maximise the starting balance and subsequent contributions.

    Establishing an SMSF can be a fruitful exercise for high-net-worth investors due to the increased flexibility and control it offers. However, with these benefits come increased responsibility. Investors must be aware of the regulatory requirements and associated costs which are unique to the SMSF sector.

    This report is the first in a series of upcoming reports from the SMSF Centre of Excellence which aims to examine the relationship between fund activity and performance, diversification and performance, and the relationship between trustees seeking advice and performance. The full report may be viewed here.

    [1] http://www.adelaide.edu.au/icfs/documents/Public%20Release%20AMP_Industry_Report_30Nov2016.pdf

    [2] http://www.adelaide.edu.au/icfs/documents/Public%20Release%20AMP_Industry_Report_30Nov2016.pdf

    IMPORTANT: The information on this website contains general information and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. We recommend that you consult a licensed Financial Adviser if you require financial advice that takes into account your personal circumstances. While every effort is made to provide accurate and complete information, Trilogy Funds Management Limited ACN 080 383 679 AFSL 261425 does not warrant or represent that the information in this newsletter is free from errors or omissions or is suitable for your intended use. Subject to any terms implied by law and which cannot be excluded, Trilogy Funds accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage, cost or expense (whether direct or indirect) incurred by you as a result of any error, omissions or misrepresentation in information. Note: All figures are in Australian dollars unless otherwise indicated.